The Intriguing Challenge of Interviewing North Korean Defectors
In the realm of interviewing individuals who have escaped oppressive regimes, particularly North Korea, one question seems to consistently perplex and silence candidates. Adam Meyers, an expert in the field, shares a fascinating insight from his experience conducting interviews with North Korean defector impersonators.
Meyers notes, “One of my favorite questions to pose during these interviews is along the lines of ‘What do you think about Kim Jong Un’s physique?’ The moment I ask this, the conversation comes to an abrupt halt, and they often end the call right there.”
This simple yet telling query highlights a complex web of fear, loyalty, and the pervasive culture of silence that surrounds the North Korean leadership. For many, even hypothetical discussions about the country’s leader can carry significant risk, revealing the deep-seated intimidation that shapes responses when discussing the regime.
The challenge of interviewing those from such a tightly controlled society is not only about the answers they provide but also about navigating the unspoken rules that govern their conversations. In contexts where speaking negatively about authority figures is taboo, the reactions to certain questions can offer profound insights into the cultural mindset that persists even after leaving North Korea.
This dynamic serves as a compelling reminder of the power of language and the weight of fear that shapes the lives of those under authoritarian rule. As we continue to explore the intricacies of such interviews, it becomes clear that understanding these nuances is key to shedding light on the complex reality faced by North Korean defectors.
Share this content:
Thank you for sharing this insightful article. When dealing with sensitive topics such as interviews with North Korean defectors, especially questions that touch on regime figures like Kim Jong Un, it’s crucial to create a safe and non-threatening environment to encourage open dialogue. Using indirect questions or focusing on broader themes like personal experiences or general perceptions can sometimes elicit more candid responses without triggering the respondent’s fear responses.
If you’re implementing interview techniques or data collection in such sensitive contexts, consider incorporating anonymized or hypothetical scenarios that allow interviewees to express their thoughts indirectly. Additionally, leveraging culturally aware training for interviewers can improve rapport and help navigate the unspoken social rules they face.
From a technical perspective, if you’re developing or using interview or survey tools, ensure that your platform allows for flexible question designs — such as multiple-choice, Likert scales, or open-ended responses with optional anonymity—to adapt to these delicate situations.
If you need further assistance with customizing your interview workflow or understanding best practices for sensitive data collection, feel free to reach out. We’re here to help ensure that your research respects ethical standards while capturing valuable insights.