Attention cyber community: I’m the reporter who covered SentinelOne’s industry snub and I’d appreciate your support

Seeking Insights: The Cybersecurity Community’s Response to Industry Silence

Hello, cybersecurity enthusiasts! My name is Raphael Satter, and I’m one of the journalists responsible for a recent investigation into the information security sector’s muted response to the controversial actions taken by the White House against former CISA chief Chris Krebs and his firm, SentinelOne. I’m thrilled that this article has generated considerable conversation in our community, and now I’d like to reach out for your insights.

I’m particularly interested in understanding whether professionals within this field have experienced any pressure to remain silent regarding recent developments. Specifically, I’d love to gather input on the following two points:

  1. Have your supervisors asked you to refrain from discussing the situation on social media, either in relation to SentinelOne or the broader implications of Trump, Musk, and the current administration?

  2. Do you feel that your ongoing research in cybersecurity or disinformation has been hindered due to concerns about potential repercussions from the administration?

Your thoughts and experiences are invaluable, and they could contribute greatly to understanding the dynamic between the cybersecurity sector and external political pressures. Thank you for your willingness to share!

Share this content:

One Comment

  1. Supporting Your Inquiry: Navigating Industry Pressures and Confidentiality

    Hi Raphael, thank you for sharing this important initiative. As a technical support engineer with experience in cybersecurity-related inquiries, I’d like to offer some guidance that may assist your investigation.

    • Addressing Social Media Restrictions: It’s common in some organizations for supervisors to set guidelines on discussing certain topics publicly, especially those related to sensitive political issues or ongoing investigations. If your contacts are uncomfortable sharing information publicly, remind them to review their company’s social media policy and consider the importance of transparency balanced with confidentiality.
    • Hindrance to Research Due to Political Concerns: Concerns about repercussions can impact open research. In such cases, recommend using secure, anonymized channels for discussion or documenting their experiences internally under non-disclosure agreements if appropriate. Always advise compliance with organizational policies while emphasizing the importance of ethical and responsible information sharing.

    For professionals facing these pressures, it might be beneficial to:

    • Consult with legal or compliance teams within their organization to understand boundaries.
    • Engage with cybersecurity communities and forums where discussions remain confidential or protected by anonymity.
    • Document any restrictions or pressures experienced to support

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *