Hello cyber community! I’m the journalist who covered SentinelOne’s industry neglect, and I’d appreciate your support.

Seeking Insights: The Cybersecurity Industry’s Silence After SentinelOne’s Controversy

Greetings, cyberspace community!

I’m Raphael Satter, a journalist deeply invested in shining a light on cybersecurity matters, and I recently covered an intriguing development regarding SentinelOne and its reception in the industry. As many of you may have seen in my latest article here, the cybersecurity sector appears to have taken a step back following criticism from the White House directed at former CISA chief Chris Krebs and his company, SentinelOne.

The response to this story has been compelling and has ignited significant conversations within our field. However, I am eager to delve deeper into this phenomenon and would appreciate your insights.

If you’re a part of the cybersecurity landscape, I’d love to hear your thoughts on a couple of points:

  1. Silencing at Work: Have you or your colleagues been instructed to refrain from discussing this situation on social media, or to remain discreet concerning broader topics related to the Trump administration and figures like Elon Musk?

  2. Research Concerns: Do you sense that your ongoing work in cybersecurity or disinformation research is being hindered out of concerns about potential repercussions from the administration?

Your feedback is invaluable as it can help illuminate the challenges many face in our industry today. Thank you for considering sharing your experiences, and let’s foster a larger dialogue about the implications of these events on our professional lives.

Share this content:

One Comment

  1. Understanding Industry Silence and Its Impacts

    Hi Raphael, thank you for shedding light on this critical issue. The cybersecurity industry has historically been cautious when it comes to discussing sensitive political topics, especially when they involve government actions or figures who can influence industry perception and compliance risks.

    Regarding your points:

    • Silencing at Work: It is not uncommon for organizations and professionals to receive informal or formal guidance to avoid discussing certain topics publicly, especially if they might attract political scrutiny or backlash. If you or your colleagues are being advised to remain discreet on social media concerning sensitive topics, it might be part of broader risk management strategies.
    • Research Concerns: Researchers and cybersecurity practitioners may indeed feel apprehensive about sharing findings related to disinformation, political interference, or controversial figures. This can stem from fears of retaliation, reputational damage, or even legal implications.

    To navigate these challenges, consider the following steps:

    • Secure Communication: Use encrypted channels for sensitive discussions and avoid sharing proprietary or potentially contentious insights on unsecured platforms.
    • Community Engagement: Join trusted industry groups or forums where open dialogue is encouraged and protected by community norms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *