Seeking Insights: The Cybersecurity Industry’s Silence After SentinelOne’s Controversy
Greetings, cyberspace community!
I’m Raphael Satter, a journalist deeply invested in shining a light on cybersecurity matters, and I recently covered an intriguing development regarding SentinelOne and its reception in the industry. As many of you may have seen in my latest article here, the cybersecurity sector appears to have taken a step back following criticism from the White House directed at former CISA chief Chris Krebs and his company, SentinelOne.
The response to this story has been compelling and has ignited significant conversations within our field. However, I am eager to delve deeper into this phenomenon and would appreciate your insights.
If you’re a part of the cybersecurity landscape, I’d love to hear your thoughts on a couple of points:
-
Silencing at Work: Have you or your colleagues been instructed to refrain from discussing this situation on social media, or to remain discreet concerning broader topics related to the Trump administration and figures like Elon Musk?
-
Research Concerns: Do you sense that your ongoing work in cybersecurity or disinformation research is being hindered out of concerns about potential repercussions from the administration?
Your feedback is invaluable as it can help illuminate the challenges many face in our industry today. Thank you for considering sharing your experiences, and let’s foster a larger dialogue about the implications of these events on our professional lives.
Share this content:
Understanding Industry Silence and Its Impacts
Hi Raphael, thank you for shedding light on this critical issue. The cybersecurity industry has historically been cautious when it comes to discussing sensitive political topics, especially when they involve government actions or figures who can influence industry perception and compliance risks.
Regarding your points:
To navigate these challenges, consider the following steps: