Understanding VirusTotal Results: Debunking the “False Positive” Myth
In the realm of cybersecurity, interpreting VirusTotal (VT) results can be a daunting task. Many users tend to downplay findings, labeling them as “probably a false positive” when only a handful of antivirus solutions flag a file. However, this assumption can be misleading and potentially harmful.
Note: I’ve held similar assumptions in the past, so I completely empathize with anyone still grappling with this issue.
A Helpful Resource
For those seeking clarity, I highly recommend checking out the informative video by MalwareAnalysisForHedgehogs. It offers valuable insights into understanding the various elements present in VirusTotal. You can watch it here.
Key Factors to Consider in VirusTotal Results
Detection Trends
- Reanalysis is Crucial: If your file hasn’t been recently analyzed, be sure to recheck it. Detection rates can evolve over time, and VT can provide details on previous scans.
- Examine Malware Labels: Understand the significance of different labels. For example, terms like “not-a-virus” indicate that a file isn’t inherently malicious, but it could be misused. However, not all antivirus vendors utilize this classification.
File Information
- Verify File Authenticity: Ensure that the file type matches what it claims to be.
- Submission Date Matters: Take note of the first submission date. If it predates when the software was officially released, there’s a chance that you’re dealing with recycled malware.
- Review Alternate Names: If the file is associated with entirely different names, it may have been renamed for deceptive purposes. Common names like update.exe or random character strings can often be disregarded.
Behavioral Analysis
- Monitor File Activity: Analyze the files it drops, deletes, or alters. If it’s accessing areas it shouldn’t, that raises a red flag.
- Registry Changes: A legitimate software update shouldn’t be disabling vital system functions like Defender, command prompt, or task manager.
- Highlighted Calls: Pay attention to functions like GetTickCount, which some malware might use to identify virtual machines to evade detection (more on this [here](https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/
Share this content:
Thank you for sharing this insightful article on VirusTotal result interpretation. It’s important to remember that a limited number of antivirus detections does not automatically indicate a false alarm. Many advanced malware samples are designed to bypass detection by specific engines, especially early in their development. Reanalyzing files periodically can help catch evolving threats, and paying close attention to behavioral indicators—such as unexpected system modifications or suspicious network activity—often provides better context than detection counts alone.
Additionally, understanding the context of file submissions, including their source and intended use, can prevent unnecessary alarm. Always corroborate VirusTotal findings with behavioral analysis and other security measures to get a comprehensive view of potential threats. If you have any specific files or alerts you’re concerned about, feel free to share the details for more tailored assistance.