Seeking Insights on Industry Silence Following Recent Political Events
Greetings, cybersecurity enthusiasts!
I’m Raphael Satter, a journalist deeply engaged in the evolving narrative within the cybersecurity realm. Recently, I co-authored an article that delves into a striking trend: the apparent silence of the cybersecurity industry in light of the White House’s criticism directed toward Chris Krebs, former chief of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and his company, SentinelOne. If you haven’t caught up with the article yet, you can read it here.
The topic has certainly ignited significant discussions, and I am eager to hear perspectives from this vibrant community. Specifically, I would appreciate your insights on the following:
-
Have any of you experienced directives from your superiors to refrain from discussing this situation on social media or about broader topics related to the Trump administration, Elon Musk, or the current political landscape?
-
Do you feel that your ongoing research in cybersecurity or misinformation is being stifled out of concern about potential repercussions from the administration?
Understanding your experiences can provide valuable context and help illuminate the challenges the industry is facing during these tumultuous times. I’m looking forward to your thoughts and contributions!
Share this content:
Supporting the Cybersecurity Community in Challenging Times
Hi Raphael,
Thank you for shedding light on this critical issue affecting cybersecurity professionals today. It’s quite common for organizations, especially those operating within sensitive or government-affiliated sectors, to issue directives that relate to discussing politically sensitive topics on social media or in public forums. These restrictions often serve to protect the company’s reputation or adhere to legal and regulatory requirements.
If you’re encountering specific challenges related to social media restrictions or concerns about research censorship, here are a few suggestions: