Hello digital security enthusiasts! I’m the reporter who covered SentinelOne’s industry neglect saga, and I need your support.

Seeking Insights: The Cybersecurity Industry’s Silence on SentinelOne

Hello, cybersecurity community! My name is Raphael Satter, and I recently authored an article discussing the unsettling hush that has enveloped the cybersecurity sector following the White House’s contentious comments regarding Chris Krebs, the former chief of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and his company, SentinelOne.

This piece has ignited a significant conversation, and I am eager to delve deeper into the nuances of this situation. I would appreciate your perspectives on a couple of key points:

  1. Maintaining Silence: Have you, or someone in your organization, felt pressured to refrain from discussing this issue on social media? Are there unspoken expectations regarding your commentary on broader topics, such as the Trump administration or public figures like Elon Musk?

  2. Impact on Research: Are you experiencing any constraints on your cyber or disinformation research due to concerns about potential backlash from current administration policies?

Your insights are invaluable. By sharing your experiences, we can better understand the current climate within the cybersecurity community as it responds to these recent developments. Thank you for your contributions!

Share this content:

One Comment

  1. Hi Raphael, thank you for raising this important topic. In the cybersecurity community, discussions around sensitive issues like industry neglect or political influences can sometimes be met with caution, especially given organizational policies or potential repercussions.

    Many professionals feel pressured to maintain silence or avoid commenting on controversial topics to safeguard their employment or reputation. It’s crucial to understand your organization’s social media and communication policies to navigate these situations properly.

    Regarding research constraints, concerns about backlash or political repercussions can indeed impact the depth and scope of cyber or disinformation research. It’s advisable to document your findings thoroughly and stay informed about your organization’s guidelines to mitigate risks.

    If you’re seeking a platform to share your insights safely, consider anonymous channels or engaging with external cybersecurity forums where free expression is encouraged within ethical boundaries. Remember, open dialogue and transparency are vital for advancing industry understanding and accountability.

    Feel free to reach out if you need specific technical guidance or resources to support your research and communication efforts.

Leave a Reply to [email protected] Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *