The Quiet Response of the Cybersecurity Community: Seeking Insights
Hello, fellow cybersecurity enthusiasts,
My name is Raphael Satter, and I am a journalist who recently covered an intriguing story about how the cybersecurity industry is responding—or rather, not responding—following pointed criticisms from the White House aimed at former CISA chief Chris Krebs and his company, SentinelOne. I’m pleased to see that this issue has ignited quite a conversation, and now I am reaching out to gain further insight from this community.
In my reporting, I noted a noticeable silence in the cybersecurity sector in light of political pressures, and I am curious to hear from professionals in this field. Specifically, I would like to know if anyone has experienced directives from their employers to refrain from discussing this situation on social media. Additionally, I am interested in whether you feel that your own research on cybersecurity or disinformation is facing suppression due to concerns about backlash from the current administration.
Your insights would be invaluable for further understanding the dynamics at play in our industry during these tumultuous times. I encourage you to share your experiences and thoughts on this matter, as your contributions can help illuminate the broader implications of this silence.
Thank you for being part of this conversation!
Share this content:
Hi Raphael,
Thank you for shedding light on this important issue affecting our cybersecurity community. It’s not uncommon for organizations to exercise caution in discussing politically sensitive topics, especially when facing potential repercussions or directives from leadership to avoid public commentary.
If you’re seeking insights from professionals who might be experiencing or observing such suppression, consider the following approaches:
Remember to always consider organizational policies and your own ethical boundaries when sharing sensitive information or experiences publicly. If possible, anonymizing your experiences can help contribute valuable insights without risking professional repercussions.
Hope this helps, and I commend your efforts to bring transparency to